He would keep his underwear if he got in the bath with his son, as Exclusive Brethren were taught to not be naked in front of anyone apart from their married partners.
end quote (my bold)
What load of bullshit. …. “taught to not be naked in front of anyone apart from their married partners.” ?
They may like to pretend to be morally superior (may even convince themselves that they are)
But check it out .The truth is they have swept sex abuses under the carpet for years now.So much so that they may have even allowed their own conscience to overlook it. For instance, consider the case of their one time leader, James Taylor jr . In regard to the Aberdeen incident .
See here for instance https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/friendshipgarden10538/the-aberdeen-incident-t10864.html
“We are not ashamed”–says Big Jim
London Daily Express
Reunited … Big Jim and Mrs. Ker
Big Jim Taylor put his arm round dark haired Mrs. Madeline Ker at his Brooklyn, New York, home tonight, kissed her lightly on the cheek and said: “I don’t care what people say. She is a very, very pure person.”
Then the balding, silver haired leader of the Close Brethren said: “We have never at any time done anything improper.”
Resting on his lap was a large leather-bound bible, and in his right hand he held a tumbler half full of Scotch.
As we talked in the upstairs sitting room of his large detached house 32-yeard-old Mrs. Ker, mother of four, from Harrow, Middlesex, smiled up at him.
When I arrived at his home, Big Jim was sitting in an armchair wearing only underpants.
He said: “I suppose I had better put my pants on. But, quite honestly, I find it more comfortable just sitting in my underpants.”
Big Jim seemed quite at ease, and quite oblivious of the sensation surrounding him and Mrs. Ker and her husband during their recent visit to Negg, Aberdeenshire.
Then it was claimed that Mrs. Ker had been found in bed with him when other members of the sect walked in.
It led to a furious row among members of the sect, and today Big Jim was busy sending off up to 8,000 letters “explaining” the events in Scotland.
Mrs. K and her husband Alan, a research chemist are staying with Big Jim and his wife Irene (60).
Today Mr. Ker was not at the house, and Mr. Taylor and Mrs. Ker explained that [he] had gone to Washington on business and would be back later.
Mr. Taylor, who claims that his hold on the leadership of the Brethren is still unchallenged, said: “Absolutely nothing happened in that bedroom that Mrs. Ker and I are ashamed about.
“It is true she was laying under the sheet on the same bed as myself. But I was on one side of the bed, and she was on the other.”
Whose clothes were on the floor?
Said he: “Some of the clothes were mine. I don’t know who the other clothes belonged to.” “I didn’t ask her to lie under the sheet. Mrs. K chose to lie under it of her own free will. “Certainly nothing improper happened, and it is wrong to say that she was naked.”
From Philip Finn, New York, Monday
Please note how this report above was evidently written by a reporter from London Daily Express
Look into it.You’ll soon track down enough evidence.
There are even photo’s available too
The exclusive Brethren leader with whiskey in one hand while his other hand rests on the breast of another mans wife
Get that ?
Another mans wife !!!
My point is. These Exclusive Brethren have indeed been busily turning a blind eye to this sort of sexual shit for years now. Quietly sweeping it under the carpet
They might declare that they don’t. But there is plenty of evidence still available to suggest otherwise
Miles of it
Oh so you still don’t want to believe it ? . Well just consider this other relatively recent evidence as well too then
Potential witness in Exclusive Brethren sex abuse case paid to remain silent
How much evidence does a society need ? (People within general society must be bloody stupid.Acting like ignorant fools.And because of it Exclusive Brethren must be laughing their way to the bank and back.Clapping their hands together for joy that non-brethren can continually remain so gullible)
These liars are still able to claim charity status .
Imagine that !
An amount of your tax dollars are still being pilfered so as to help keep the sleazy head honcho’s of this crowd rich at your expense
For years you lot (general public with your heads deeply buried in the sand) have helped to reward deviate scum by delivering them charity status .
And the funny thing is
that they wouldn’t even care to have a cup of tea or eat with any of you. Because they also consider you lot to be “below” them . They secretly despise you all. And for this reason they separate from you and will talk about you secretly (within their church meetings) as if you are evil untouchable low life
And yet you still continue to help to reward them
By “not bothering” to question why your tax dollars are still being issued (through charity status) to a group of people who wouldn’t even want to socialize with any of you.
People who also wouldn’t allow their children to be able to marry any of your own children
Think about that carefully (You dollars are being used to prop up an exclusive club of which your own children will also be prevented from ever being able to enter themselves)
So in this manner
Your tax dollors are being spent to help support folk who are bigoted “against you”
The general public must be bloody stupid?? . Been constantly acting like a bunch of real total dumb fucks
Mainstream Christians don’t care to question this “carry on” themselves either. No way they wont !!!!
Well because they also don’t like the idea that the general public might also soon start to demand more transparency too, in regard to their own “charity rort ” as well
They dont care “so much” if Brethren are busily ripping apart families. What matters more is that mainstream groups are also able to continue to fly under the radar as well too (IE: they wont demand that brethren would be scrutinized, because they fear that their own group might then be scrutinized more as well also .So in this manner the Brethren and mainstream churches are both members of a common-club)
Lets face it. For generations now.Charity status has been used to help promote religion.If you were to look back through church records, you wont be likely to find many instances where much money has been used to help support atheists
They’ll happily grab your tax dollars through charity status (which you’ll allow them to have ,without question),they’ll then use it to build schools and hospitals (so as to make themselves look far more superior )than any atheist groups will ever be able to help build (simply because atheists are unable to claim charity status like what religious groups have always been freely allowed to do) .
And then they’ll look down their noses at atheists and sometimes might even be publicly heard suggesting how atheist, are immoral (for not believing in God)
Funny huh ? (they diddle non-believers for tax dollars and may then also get away with calling non-believers immoral )
What a “sweet rort” huh ? (talk about wickedly great ease of fleecing the general public, a number of whom will have also been atheist)
Perhaps one day more general public may begin to wake up to it.