To me this discussion seem interesting. It provide a point of opinion from alternative outlook
Around 32.19 mark ,is an important thing to consider . And William Lane Craig gets away with it. People don’t even bother to question it. Luke Barnes does too (get away with).Big bag doesn’t necessarily mean we’d have ability to know there was nothing before?. Even Luke agree its plausible the universe lasted forever .IE: therefore, talking about a actual beginning, is difficult.Even though, perhaps theist have promoted the idea that it isn’t difficult ?
Whatever the conclusion. We still go back to why we cannot detect any positive evidence,of a-God, within this world of ours at this moment right now?. Like, why can we not detect that God perhaps answer one particular group of believers prayers, more than other groups prayers?. Specially when these groups are claiming their-Go is also in fact the-God (IE: and as such that other groups Gods, are not the God, but are only kind of impostor make-believe type Gods. Like all the many so called Gods, that minds of men have constantly devised, right time )
Believers demand brute facts to explain why the universe? . But on the other hand also wont require brute facts ,for evidence based belief, to explain why we dont see positive evidence of God here around us still in here our world today (Take note ,remember holy books do describe evidence of heaps of these brute facts.Like when water was changed into wine,Demons being cast out into herds of pigs,walking on water,and so on)
So why then, isnt this evidence still plainly available, for all of us to freely study and observe ourselves too?.And for science to test ?
Will add on, more to my own thoughts, after later on ,when i have time (post to the 100.29 mark)