Christians are been busily “warning” the atheist, about the dire consequence of loss of “eternal” life
As if that should necessarily need to be our main concern?
Tim Scott Jill Aebi-Mytton well, tbh, I’v said what I personally have found to be true. I’m not preaching but having a conversation. It’s hilarious to think a human being think that a God has to prove who He is to a human. God does not need us. God does not need anything. He is God but if we do ask Him he will show himself. Iv actually witnessed this. I mean it’s mind boggling to think we think we are intelligent enough to understand life without a higher power. Even the greatest human brains will never understand who God is. I mean for one, although I’m hungry to learn, understand, see more, right to our dying day, we are not going understand. For me death has no power over me, as I know when I fall asleep, I’m going to my next life. I’m going to be with Christ. For any person who has convinced themselves that God does not exist is facing death. It’s as simple as that. Pretty awful when most of us are over 50, some over 60 or 70. Blink and we will be facing death. No wonder so many are so grouchy, they don’t have any time left. Regardless of what degrees or learning we do. The body we have is failing, I’m 51 in a way I’m not old, but I’m not young, but what I do know, although I do not want to die, if I do, I’m looking forward to a life with my God. For the so called unbelievers it’s a pretty grim place to be. Just saying. So yes, if we want to experience joy, peace, love, ask God. So for any person who has convinced themselves their is no God, crack on.Find support or report comment
Tim Scott doesn’t realize how he’s been duped into trading in the higher quality of life on earth, as it “would have been”, had of we been able live our live’s freely without our lives being blighted by detrimental affect of religious fundamentalism
Tim Scott has already lost out . Tim Scotts quality of life has already been used to gamble on prospect of of life eternal
Should eternal life end up being nothing more than “wishful thinking” , then Tim Scott’s dream of eternal life will in affect in fact have managed to help to produce nothing more than a deficit for Tim Scott
This is the point what Pascals wager is inclined to overlook .Believers , being apt to often be the type to “gloat” will have completely overlooked the possibility for the loss incurred
The Brethren are no different. They’ll also do likewise. They’ll also be “so puffed up with their ways of gloating” over their expectation to gain for themselves big-time (IE: life eternal), it most likely wont even occur to them that perhaps their gamble might have been “placed on false hope”. And that this false hope has in fact already been costly, unto their quality of life of what they had been forced to live
Meaning that they’ll be still bound to be losing a lot rather than gaining
The thought of it never crosses their mind ?
They get so hyped up on their expectation “to win” . That they’ll then also remain clueless, in regard to “how much they will have already lost out” on
Kind of cute isn’t it ?
And it mightn’t be half so bad either, if in fact there wasn’t so much harm being caused unto so many, due to these theists craving for life internal
But sadly, this gamble of Pascal wager cannot be claimed to be un-costly. Its already been costing, the human-lives, big time
The “collateral cost of this gamble” are already immense
Whats more, day by day, year by year, and generation after generation that passes by, the cost of this gamble is still continuing to grow larger and larger
Not that the theist will have a clue about that side of the equation
Most will be far to busy with their “ways of gloating”. And be far to preoccupied with their acts of fear mongering. And so on
If it wasn’t able to be ruining so many other humans lives, alongside their own lives. Then hey, it might even be hilarious to think how some human can be coached into becoming “so gullible” , by way of their own free choice
To think , that all the while they’d “gloat” and “attempt to be warning others” , about “possibility for loss”, that meanwhile they’d be the ones who’d be already unwittingly allowing their own lives to also be gambled away on a false hope
The sad part is, that its not only just their own lives that they’d be gambling with, but due to the lies of so called religious liberty, then this mean that their own faith is in fact able to ruin the lives of both the believer and the atheist
Meanwhile, these puffed theist, will be looking upon this gamble, as if there’d be “nothing to lose” for anyone
Brethren are acting similar
They likewise, will be quite willing to gamble with “the quality of lives” of the ex eb, via their way of causing family to excommunicate
In the mind of the Brethren, they’d also see it as if “its clear cut gamble”, and act as if there’d be absolutely nobody who’d ever have anything to lose
Both Tim Scott and the Brethren are “both acting on equal par” in this respect
None of these people could care less, to bother to consider the consequence of “losses already incurred” , by unwilling participant, should it turn out “that their gamble” had been placed on false hope
They don’t even care to bother to factor it into the equation
Just like Pascal , they falsely figure that their gamble would be winner
Completely overlook the losses of what have already been incurred
Most “wont even consider” the cost of their gamble
It wont even dawn on them that they’ll have incurred cost, within their lives, already, due to their gamble on life eternal
Brethren certainly don’t bother . I have doubt that Tim Scott will be any different either. Note how they’ll never stop to mention this factor
Mainly being as “the thought” more or less never even occur to them
Their ways (IE: the believers ways of life) are so similar to the ways of the gambler’s-addiction who’s become so-addicted to gambling on horses, that they’ll not even bother to stop and consider the kind of consequences that their gambling addiction may have “on others” , even if “the others” would be causing harm unto their spouse & children
Gamblers don’t care less about considering consequence caused unto “others”
They generally don’t even bother to factor in the “losses” incurred by others “who’d rather to not need to be affected” by gambling-addiction
Meanwhile, the believer, is also the type of gambler who also believe that their-addiction is directly connected to “high morals”
Not once will stop to consider if their belief might stink of immorality
It might ruin the lovely sense of gloating?
Believer are so focused on how life can be over within the blink of an eye, that they’ll have also completely overlooked the interesting valid thought of how so many people lives will have already been whittled away, slowly
After all, “the religious people” are generally not bothered with teaching their faithful friend to pay much attention to days of this life
Just exactly like the Brethren
All believers, are being taught to devalue “this life” what we have here on earth
That’s the reason why they will do?
They’ve been taught to live life as if their gamble cannot lose
When the reality is
“The gambles already come at a real great cost”
But hey. Believers are taught how to overlook it. Taught how to act as if Pascal’s wager was built on good reason
Same way that Jim Jones were also able to convince his own flock that their faith was built on good reason to, and “was a gamble of what couldn’t ever fail”
This is nothing new under the sun
People have been led up the garden path, by these same methods, generation after generation
Its a great racket
There have been million upon million of cult leader whom have all gotten wealthy in one way or another
The gullible faith-gambler still act as if they’d have absolutely nothing to lose
They all follow the same path. When it wasn’t the-Christian being willing to gamble with the lives of others (as like what people with gambling addiction do ), in other times it might have been Aztec who’d have been happy to sacrifice the lives “of others” in hope of gaining better crops , so as to gain wealth
They’ll always all see it, as if its “being done for the “greater good“
Too don’t they?
Isn’t that how it works
This thought then allow them to find a way in “which to sleep well”
A way in which for themselves to feel as if their gamble is morally acceptable too
Brethren’s ways are no different either are they ?
They’ll (the Brethren) also consider that harming the ex ebs lives, is morally acceptable, upon considering how its being done for the greater good
This attitude has been immensely costly
The cost of “eternal life” is immense. Anyone who’d dare to declare that Jesus had paid the full price of salvation,on the cross
Would have need to be overlooking tremendous amount of human suffering. Cost of suffering of what still continues to amount up to this very day
Not that “the believer” bother to factor it in
They dismiss it. Pretend as if there is “absolutely nothing” for anyone of us to ever lose
Next thing, they’ll be some of the people who’ll “be feeling up in arms” to think about “how utterly inconsiderate” ,of others, that the Brethren are been acting-like
Kind of cute isn’t it ?
That’s faith 101
IE: who gives a fuck about “what the cost of faith” might be costing unto-others
Meanwhile, they’ll be saying how it should be the atheist who’d have reason to fear death (IE: as if they’d think that a-God might also approve with their inconsiderate mannerism)
Meanwhile they’ll also be telling us that we -atheist, might need to have good reason to feel so-worried about the idea that we might not be-securing ourselves a place among the heavenly congregation of these bands of inconsiderate mannered believers
Be such a beautiful blissful place of wonderful peace and glorious love (what we atheist might miss out on)
Dreaded thought, it should be, to feel fearful of oneself “not being included among the throng” of inconsiderate faithful gamblers
To fear not finding oneself a place among the throng of believers who’s faith has acted as the catalyst for huge amount of human-suffering.
That this fear should be really causing us to be having nightmare?
If it wasn’t bad enough to be born among bigoted Brethren, we might have a holy place of bigotry to also look forward to, in an afterlife, in times when we will again be reunited among large flock of human who’d all been happy to overlook the cost of human suffering, so long as it might serve to deliver themselves eternal live
We would then also proceed to constantly praise Jesus for paying the full cost of human salvation
And just exactly like what the Brethren choose to do
We would also proceed to act as if “the suffers” were only just bitter
We would deny that any of them-others had helped to pay for the cost of our hope for salvation
We would deny it
We would stand our ground and stick to our claim ,that our Jesus had pre-paid the full cost of human salvation, on the cross at Calvary
No way would we dare to admit to the idea that their might have been million upon million of human of who’d paid a huge price
Those folk would be “deemed to be liars” (exactly the way like what Brethren already try to do, too)
We could all sit in our heaven,looking down our nose at the other-people who’d be the ones who’d dare to complain about “the cost incurred”, all the while we were all feeling so joyfully shit hot about ourselves
And feeling so morally righteous too
Our heaven would be a place to feel joyfully wonderful. We all stand around patting each other on the back while we’d proceed to act as toe-suckers to Jesus (kind of exactly similar to same-ways like how the Brethren will pat themselves on the back too, while also all acting like a bunch of yo yo “brown nosing toe-sucker” to Brucie review wrecker Hales)
Peas of the pod?
Its always been the bases of salvation … all these variant acts of brown nosing toe-sucking
Salvation basically = brown nosing 101
Time and time again,that’s how its been “sold as being” about
Nothing ever “so new” about any of it.. Really?
Same old same old … packaged in different styled packages
So watch out… You better be SURE to BE ….. FEARFUL
Get down and toe suck your wee hearts out
Quick ….. Quick
Or God will “do you over” big time … Make you suffer for “an eternity” too
Being how he’s also such a lovingly forgiving kind of chap
How dare dare human demand evidence of God
How dare they?
Who cares about how many human should have need to suffer greatly,due to this gamble
How dare the human demand to see evidence
How stupid of the human
Who the hell do they think they are?
Hilarious to think human should require evidence
Whats wrong with firing ahead, while also ruining million of human lives along the way
Without even first requiring evidence
What in the hell’s ever wrong with doing things like that?
Why should the head-honcho be require to provide evidence
So as harm isnt caused to people needlessly ?
Bugger them people
Who cares about them folk? .. Them opposers ? … Just acting bitter?
Is Bruce review wrecker Hales required to provide good evidence?
He’s not required to
He’s the head honcho
Gods like the even bigger head honcho bully
Since when were the powerful expected to need to prove their worth
What in the hell could ever go wrong if we were being required to live by faith alone
How hilarious that the silly atheist would think that evidence might be fairly important
How utterly stupid of them
Those Aztec folk … didn’t usually require to see evidence
Those folk were faithful
Good faithful believers . More than happy to allow their family member to be sacrificed to the Sun God
No evidence required
Who cares if the practice had never served to provide better food production… or never served to protect against disease
What does that matter?
How hilarious to think the non-believer thinks it might be valuable to expect that a-God might like to provide plain evidence
What in the hell for?
Doing that, would ruin faith… Take away the faith part of the belief
God demand that human would suffer… big time
He doesn’t care how many human would suffer
And anyway at the end of the day God still demand to claim that he’d have paid the full price of the human salvation
That would be morally righteous … If the God were to decide that it should be
Very similar way to exactly how
Bruce review wrecker Hales can also simply alter the working of “moral righteousness ” as well too
Because of how power= righteousness
Plain and simple ?
He who’d be most powerful… get to define rule of righteousness
Nobody has any right to question
Cut and dry conclusion … Anyone non believer who’d dare to question the workings of it
Has lost their marble
Who in their right mind would ever bother to question the school bullies interpretation of righteousness
Who’d ever bother?
If you wouldn’t dare to ever question the school bullies interpretation of righteousness, then why would anyone ever dare to question Gods interpretation of righteousness ?
He “who’d be most powerful” .. therefore naturally gets to define righteousness
We’d also be righteous to follow the most powerful bully…without question
Oh what a lovely band of brown-nosing toe suckers